| it? You don't find it odd?? "BTW, the burden of proof is on *you* to SHOW that the ECU's are unsafe. It's not I that has to show evidence. It's pretty hard to do that when you're arguing that people haven't had problems with a product." This from REDZX,
"I called up Greg D to see if he can cure my problem (as he always does). To my surprise, Greg invited me to come over....I got there and met SeedyRom (Ryan) which was cool and when Greg had the chance, he hooked up the Fuel Pressure Gauge to my car and we went for a ride. He remarked that it was very sluggish and the fuel pressure was normal, there was nothing wrong with my fuel system. So, knowing that this may be the case I had brought along my chip with the Stock Eprom program." You do know of Greg D is right? He checkover the Z before they put it on the dyno. I guess you didn't read that part? Nor this?? This from REDZX,
"Unfortunately, we found 2 screws missing and apparently (I did not know this) there is supposed to be tape over the chip which there was not (to save the chip from being erased)." Any professsional business would have check everything before they shipout the final product it just goes to show they didn't and why I commented on your statement. A quote from you,
"" I think a lot more credit should be given to the reliabity of Ash's chips than is currently given." And if you say that was not there job to check their ecu then the business field will never be for you. Have you ever heard of TQM, Total Quality Management? A quote Red ZX,
"I got the Stock Chip back in and Greg and I went for a ride. Immediately a few things were noticed, increase throttle response and my engine was not pinging. I was very happy but also upset at the same time. I jumped on the freeway to go to the Dyno shop and boy let me tell you...she felt so so so much better on the freeway. So, here is the dyno with the new stock chip and here is also the old one to compare the two:" If this doens't make sense to you then nothing will and you need to buy a z1 ecu? Do me a favor and go back into his history (Red ZX) and see the type of person this guy is? "Next...are you seriously going to refute that you jump into almost EVERY one of these ECU debates, and on a side against Z1? I never said you "hated" Z1 or Ash...only that it *seems* (my explicit words) that you have a subverted motive for going against them. You just seem to have an awful lot of motivation to 'spread the word' against Ash/Z1 without a proportional amount of supporting data." Now it's time for you to put up or shut up?? So far you have showed me no facts to believe any thing you have said so show me in quotes or links where I jump into **EVERY ECU debate**? You are really starting to sound like ash. :( "Don't read too much into it. I'm not trying to say there's some kind of consipiracy." Hmmm, selective reading, and consipiracy??? You sound wierd or atleast prove your point with facts such as links or quotes like I did if not then you are another less informed brown noser of ash? BTW, Nice profile!! :)
 **Dynoed at 371.2 rwhp. and 362.3 rwtrq. @ .9 bar on pumped 91 gas no time tweaking 3/11/31/03**
**Dynoed at 411 rwhp. and 452 rwtq. @1.15 kg. on race gas 104 no time tweaking 3/28/03 **All numbers are SAE corrected**
|
